http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2007/01/25/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/letter01012507.txt
The World / Letters To The Editor
We must take time to find LNG
answers
Big energy and big oil are
knocking on Oregon's door. Permit applications for the placement of an
import terminal and high-pressure, 36-inch gas line will be filed the
first of the year. The proposed terminal location is the Oregon
International Port of Coos Bay. The gas line will run 223 miles under
rivers and over mountains to the California
border. This project is being pushed by an out-of-state utility and backed
by money oil companies took from you and me. The record profits oil giants
have enjoyed over the last decade have, in part, been used to lobby
Congress and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. They slipped a
provision into the 2005 energy bill to suspend state authority in these
matters. Congressmen Greg Walden and Gordon Smith voted for it, all of our
other representatives opposed it. They are seeking to do this as quietly
as possible because what they are doing will not stand the light of day.
The importation of natural gas is expensive and will allow big oil to
manipulate supplies and prices. Ratepayers will ultimately be at the mercy
of the same forces that have brought you high gas prices and record oil
profits. It also allows them unhealthy leverage in undermining attempts at
energy independence. This will affect ratepayers across the board,
business and private alike. Once the investments have been made and the
infrastructure is in place it establishes a direction for Oregon's energy
future. This spells more of the same - they lie, you pay.
It is my contention that something with such far-reaching implications
would require a healthy public dialogue. Questions need to be answered,
including the following.
Is the pipeline necessary?
If the pipeline is for California,
why is it being built here?
Is it OK for the out-of-state utilities and private enterprise to seize
the property of Oregon
citizens?
Is the introduction of a foreign
fuel source into our stable and ample domestic system a wise decision?
Have all impacts been carefully considered - fish restoration, tourism,
shellfish, commercial and sport fishing, and property values of residents
in its path?
Do the people want this on U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest
Service land?
Possible disasters, including seismic events, forest fires and landslides
must be considered. What are the consequences of a breech under one of our
rivers?
What are the scenic impacts of a 100-foot right-of-way through our
mountains?
What are the right of way
maintenance standards and who will be responsible for the control of
ladder fuels and invasive plant species?
This pipeline may not be in your backyard but this burden will fall on
some hard-working members of the Southwestern Oregon
community. Time is the one part of this equation we can afford. In this
case, we should not learn from our mistakes, but, rather, we should avoid
them. We must take the time and find the answers. These questions should
and will eventually concern and impact all Oregon
citizens. Think about this the next time you're fueling your car. Are the
oil companies and big energy the ones you want calling the shots in
Oregon's best interest? The choice is yours. Demand answers from your
elected officials. Explore the odds that your pocketbook will satisfy big
energy's bloated appetite for money.
Answer the door. It's big oil calling.
Bob Phillips