Covering the Mendocino County Marijuana Laws and showing how drug companies kill millions and outlaw cannabis with no death have been every proven. People die from eating strawberries.

FDA internally adopts "final rule" on pharmaceuticals

WASHINGTON, D.C.— It is estimated that as many as 200,000 people die each year from adverse reactions to prescription drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and about 2.2 million people are injured each year by FDA-approved drugs. FDA-approved Vioxx alone may have killed as many as 60,000 people—more U.S. fatalities than the Vietnam War.

Drug Reactions Kill More Than 100,000 A Year, Study Says

From the July 2006 Idaho Observer:

FDA internally adopts "final rule" on pharmaceuticals

Federal public "health" autocrats decide consumers cannot sue makers of FDA-approved drugs for damages

WASHINGTON, D.C.— It is estimated that as many as 200,000 people die each year from adverse reactions to prescription drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and about 2.2 million people are injured each year by FDA-approved drugs. FDA-approved Vioxx alone may have killed as many as 60,000 people—more U.S. fatalities than the Vietnam War.

On June 30, 2006, the FDA’s "final rule" regarding pharmaceutical drug liability claims went into effect. The FDA, which is now arguably the nation’s number one killer, has decided that consumers can no longer sue drug companies for the harm caused by any FDA-approved drug, even if the drug’s manufacturer intentionally misled the FDA by hiding or fabricating clinical trial data.

In a move so shocking and transparent (and baseless in legal contemplation), the FDA is attempting to eliminate any responsibility whatsoever for the suffering and death caused by the deadly pharmaceutical drugs it approves for the marketplace.

According to health advocate and author Mike Adams, "In the preamble of the FDA’s new ‘final rule’....the agency asserts that FDA approval of prescription drugs—and their implied safety—may no longer be second-guessed by consumers or organizations of any kind. The FDA’s stamp of approval, the agency claims, is an absolute declaration of safety of all such drugs, for any use whatsoever, including off-label use (the use of drugs on health conditions that were never tested in clinical trials)."

In the last couple of years the corrupt collusion between the FDA, drug companies and the medical "research" they sponsor has been reported in the mainstream press. The highly-publicized Vioxx scandal and others indicate that the FDA and cronies in the private sector are beginning to lose their grip on their $multi-billion drug approval scam and, out of desperation, have approved their "final solution"—they will administratively hold back the flood of damages suits for as long as they can.

Meanwhile, the FDA keeps approving drugs, doctors keep prescribing them, people keep taking them and America just gets sicker and sicker...

The Idaho Observer
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869
Phone: 208-255-2307
Email: observer@coldreams.com
Web:
http://idaho-observer.com
http://proliberty.com/observer/

Drug Reactions Kill More Than 100,000 A Year, Study Says

The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition

Dow Jones Newswires -- April 14, 1998
Drug Reactions Kill More Than 100,000 A Year, Study Says Dow Jones Newswires CHICAGO (AP)--Bad reactions to prescription and over-the-counter medicines kill more than 100,000 Americans and seriously injure an additional 2.1 million every year -- far more than most people realize, researchers say. Such reactions, which do not include prescribing errors or drug abuse, rank at least sixth among U.S. causes of death _ behind heart disease, cancer, lung disease, strokes and accidents, says a report based on an analysis of existing studies. "We're not saying, 'Don't take drugs.' They have wonderful benefits," said Dr. Bruce H. Pomeranz, principal investigator and a neuroscience professor at the University of Toronto. "But what we're arguing is that there should be increased awareness also of side effects, which until now have not been too well understood." The harm may range from an allergic reaction to an antibiotic to stomach bleeding from frequent doses of aspirin, Pomeranz said. The study, by Pomeranz and two other colleagues at his school, Jason Lazarou and Paul N. Corey, did not explore which medications or illnesses were involved. The authors analyzed 39 studies of hospital patients from 1966 to 1996. Serious drug reactions affected 6.7% of patients overall and fatal drug reactions 0.32%, the authors reported in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association. In the study, serious injury was defined as being hospitalized, having to extend a hospital stay or suffering permanent disability. The most surprising result was the large number of deaths, the authors said. They found adverse drug reactions ranked between fourth and sixth among leading causes of death, depending on whether they used their most conservative or most liberal estimate. In 1994, between 76,000 and 137,000 U.S. hospital patients died, and the "ballpark estimate" is 106,000, Pomeranz said. The low estimate, 76,000 deaths, would put drug reactions sixth. The ballpark estimate would put them fourth, he said. An additional 1.6 million to 2.6 million patients were seriously injured, with the ballpark estimate 2.1 million, he said. More than two-thirds of the cases involved reactions outside hospitals rather than in hospitals, the authors reported. Experts commended the study but disagreed whether the estimates are on target. Dr. David W. Bates of Partners Healthcare Systems and Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston said the estimates may be high. One reason, he said, is that they may over represent large medical centers, which treat sicker than average patients, who are more prone to reactions. "Nonetheless, these data are important, and even if the true incidence of adverse drug reactions is somewhat lower than that reported ... it is still high, and much higher than generally recognized," he added in an editorial accompanying the study. Dr. Sidney M. Wolfe, director of the consumer advocacy Public Citizen Health Research Group, said he believes the numbers are on target. "I've read most of these studies, and they represent large hospitals, small hospitals ... a heterogeneous sample of the kinds of hospitals in this country, and include a whole range," Wolfe said by telephone Tuesday from Washington. Many serious injuries and deaths are preventable, he added. Many drugs have safer available alternatives, and harmful interactions between drugs _ such as those being prescribed by two different doctors _ can be more carefully avoided, he said. In addition, doctors need to increase drug dosages slowly for many older patients, who lack the drug tolerance of younger adults because their kidneys and livers have declined, Wolfe said. Finally, hospitals should find better ways to track and head off problems, the way a model computerized system does at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City. That hospital reported last year that it discovered 50% of its adverse reactions were potentially preventable, including 42% that happened because patients were given too much medicine for their weight and kidney function. The hospital now automatically calculates patients' kidney function daily. It has reduced adverse antibiotic reactions 75% and suggested that other facilities could easily do the same. Wolfe said it is "inexcusable, given how inexpensive computers are," that other hospitals haven't copied the system.
Copyright © 1998 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dow Jones Newswires -- April 14, 1998

Drug Reactions Kill More Than 100,000 A Year, Study Says

Dow Jones Newswires

CHICAGO (AP)--Bad reactions to prescription and over-the-counter medicines kill more than 100,000 Americans and seriously injure an additional 2.1 million every year -- far more than most people realize, researchers say.

Such reactions, which do not include prescribing errors or drug abuse, rank at least sixth among U.S. causes of death _ behind heart disease, cancer, lung disease, strokes and accidents, says a report based on an analysis of existing studies.

"We're not saying, 'Don't take drugs.' They have wonderful benefits," said Dr. Bruce H. Pomeranz, principal investigator and a neuroscience professor at the University of Toronto.

"But what we're arguing is that there should be increased awareness also of side effects, which until now have not been too well understood."

The harm may range from an allergic reaction to an antibiotic to stomach bleeding from frequent doses of aspirin, Pomeranz said. The study, by Pomeranz and two other colleagues at his school, Jason Lazarou and Paul N. Corey, did not explore which medications or illnesses were involved.

The authors analyzed 39 studies of hospital patients from 1966 to 1996. Serious drug reactions affected 6.7% of patients overall and fatal drug reactions 0.32%, the authors reported in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.

In the study, serious injury was defined as being hospitalized, having to extend a hospital stay or suffering permanent disability.

The most surprising result was the large number of deaths, the authors said. They found adverse drug reactions ranked between fourth and sixth among leading causes of death, depending on whether they used their most conservative or most liberal estimate.

In 1994, between 76,000 and 137,000 U.S. hospital patients died, and the "ballpark estimate" is 106,000, Pomeranz said. The low estimate, 76,000 deaths, would put drug reactions sixth. The ballpark estimate would put them fourth, he said.

An additional 1.6 million to 2.6 million patients were seriously injured, with the ballpark estimate 2.1 million, he said.

More than two-thirds of the cases involved reactions outside hospitals rather than in hospitals, the authors reported.

Experts commended the study but disagreed whether the estimates are on target.

Dr. David W. Bates of Partners Healthcare Systems and Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston said the estimates may be high. One reason, he said, is that they may over represent large medical centers, which treat sicker than average patients, who are more prone to reactions.

"Nonetheless, these data are important, and even if the true incidence of adverse drug reactions is somewhat lower than that reported ... it is still high, and much higher than generally recognized," he added in an editorial accompanying the study.

Dr. Sidney M. Wolfe, director of the consumer advocacy Public Citizen Health Research Group, said he believes the numbers are on target.

"I've read most of these studies, and they represent large hospitals, small hospitals ... a heterogeneous sample of the kinds of hospitals in this country, and include a whole range," Wolfe said by telephone Tuesday from Washington.

Many serious injuries and deaths are preventable, he added. Many drugs have safer available alternatives, and harmful interactions between drugs _ such as those being prescribed by two different doctors _ can be more carefully avoided, he said.

In addition, doctors need to increase drug dosages slowly for many older patients, who lack the drug tolerance of younger adults because their kidneys and livers have declined, Wolfe said.

Finally, hospitals should find better ways to track and head off problems, the way a model computerized system does at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City.

That hospital reported last year that it discovered 50% of its adverse reactions were potentially preventable, including 42% that happened because patients were given too much medicine for their weight and kidney function.

The hospital now automatically calculates patients' kidney function daily. It has reduced adverse antibiotic reactions 75% and suggested that other facilities could easily do the same.

Wolfe said it is "inexcusable, given how inexpensive computers are," that other hospitals haven't copied the system.